PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA KOGNITIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA ANAK THE INFLUENCE OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY AND COGNITIVE STYLE FOR STUDENT’S MATHEMATICS ABILITY

Authors

  • Syamsul Hadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.597

Keywords:

Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual, Gaya Kognitif, Kemampuan Matematika

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif terhadap kemampuan matematika anak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 x 2. Sample yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 44 orang anak, terdiri dari 24 anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field independent dan 24 anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field dependent. Data penelitian tentang kemampuan matematika, dianalisis dengan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalan pada taraf signifikansi   = 0,05 dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tukey pada taraf signifikan   = 0,05. Hasil analisis menyimpulkan: pertama, terdapat perbedaan kemampuan matematika antara anak yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan strategi pembelajaran kontekstual dan strategi pembelajaran konvensional (Fhitung = 2,96 > Ftabel = 2,86). Kedua, kemampuan matematika antara anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field independent lebih tinggi dengan anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field dependent (Fhitung sebesar 5,763 lebih besar dari Ftabel = 4,06). Ketiga, anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field independent yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan strategi kontekstual memiliki kemampuan matematika lebih tinggi daripada anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field dependent (Fhitung = 9,70 > Ftabel = 2,86). Keempat, anak yang memiliki gaya kognitif field dependent yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan strategi pembelajaran konvensional lebih tinggi daripada anak yang mengikuti pembelajaran strategi konvensional (Fhitung = 4,37 > Ftabel = 2,86). Kelima, terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif terhadap kemampuan matematika anak (Fhitung = 30,19 > Ftabel = 4,08). This study aims to determine the effect of learning strategies and cognitive styles on children’s mathematical ability. This research using experimental method of a factorial design of 2x2 it employed 44 student as samples. They were segregated into four groups, each had 12 members. The research data were analyzed by using ANAVA techniques and further by Tukey test to understand the comparison between the experimented parties as the level significance ï¡ = 0,05. As to the measurement of the analysis conditions, it was done through the measurement of normality and homogenety. The research was concluded that: first, there was difference in ability of mathematics of students who use contextual learning and using convensional learning (Fhitung = 2,96 > Ftabel = 2,86). second, the mathematical ability of children who have field independent cognitive style higher than children who have a field-dependent cognitive style (F value of 5.763 is greater than the F table (0.05) (1.44) = 4.06). third,  the mathematical ability of student with field independent using kontextual learning was higher than using konvensional leraning (Fhitung = 9,70 > Ftabel = 2,86). fifth, the ability of mathematics of student with field dependent who using konvensional learning was higher than using kontextual leraning (Fhitung = 4,37 > Ftabel = 2,86). And fourt, there was interaction between the use of intructional strategy and learning style differences for ability of mathematics of student (Fhitung = 30,19 > Ftabel = 4,08).

Author Biography

Syamsul Hadi

 

References

Berns, R., and Erickson, P. 2001. An Interactive Web-based Model for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning. Bowling Green State University,. p. 4 Available: http://www.bgsu.edu/ ctl Brewer, Jo Ann. 2007. Early Childhood Education, Preschool Through Primary Grades. USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Brown, Frederick G. 1983. Principle of Educational and Psychological Testing; third edition. New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winson. Clifford, Matthew and Marica Wilson, Contextual Teaching Professional Learning, and Student Experiences: Lessons Learned from Implementation, (Journal, Number 2 Tahun. 2000. center on Education and Work University of Wisconsin Mandison. Crawford, Michael L. 2001. Contextually; Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science, Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc. Depdiknas. 2002. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran TK. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang Depdiknas. Eva, Essa L. 2003. Introcuction to Early Childhood Education. USA: thomson Delmar Learning. Feeny, Stephanie, Doris Christensen, and Eva Moravcik. 2006. Who I in the Lives of Children. USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Froehlich, Cognitive Styles, http://www.personal.kent.edu/~plucasst/cognitivestyles.htm diakses 12 Maret 2013 Goldstein, Kennet M. and Sheldon Blackman, 1978. Cognitive Style: Five Opproach and Relevant Research, NY: Jhon Wuley & Son

Greenberg, Jerald and Robert A Baron. 1995. Behavior in Organization. New York: Prentice Hill International, Inc. Hensey, Paul, Kenneth H. Blounchald and Downey E. Johnson. 1996. Management of Organization Behavior. New York: Prentice Hall International, inc. http://indonesianschool.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=149&forum=24&post_id=244 Keefe, James. Learning Style Theory & Practie. Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principless (NASSP). Medrich, Elliot, Sarah Caldron, and Gary Hoachlander. 2003. Contextual Teaching and Learning Strategis in High Schools: Developing a Vision for Support and Evaluation. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum. Messic s. 1976. Individuality in Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nurdin, 2005. Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Guru dan Gaya Kognitif Siswa pada Kelas It SMU Negeri 3 Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, No. 55. Tahun ke-11. Juli 2005. Ratna. 1988. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Dikti, Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga keguruan. Rendah, Prestasi Matematika Indonesia. http://alumnisaf.blogspot.com/2007/09/rendah-prestasi-matematikaindonesia.html Robbins, Stephen P. 1991. Organizational Behavior; Concepts, Controversies, and Applications. United States of America. Rumelhart & Norman, Available: http://tip.psychology.org/norman.html. Rusman. 2010. Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. Soedjadi, R. 1994. Memantapkan Matematika Sekolah Sebagai Wahana Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Penalaran. Makalah Pelatihan Guru PPs IKIP Surabaya. Sudibyo, Elok, Inna Nus Anisjak, dan M. Iksan. 2009. Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMPN 3 Porong. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, Vol.9 No. 1, Maret 2009 Uno, Hamzah B. 2006. Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Wahyu, Eka Putra. Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Problem Based Learning dan Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Abstrak Thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret. http:// eprints.uns.ac.id/8773/. Woolfolk, Anita E. 1993. Educational Psychology. London: Allyn and Bacon.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-13

How to Cite

Hadi, S. (2019). PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA KOGNITIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA ANAK THE INFLUENCE OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY AND COGNITIVE STYLE FOR STUDENT’S MATHEMATICS ABILITY. Jurnal Teknodik, 17(3), 043–046. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.597

Issue

Jurnal Teknodik Vol,17 No. 3, September 2013

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Please download and complete the Form, Copyright Transfer, and Ethics Statement Form. The following is provided at the time of submitting the text (Upload Additional Files):