PENGARUH PENDEKATAN BLENDED LEARNING MENGGUNAKAN PORTAL RUMAH BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA THE EFFECT OF BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH BY UTILIZING “RUMAH BELAJAR” PORTAL ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF INTEGRATED SCIENCE

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.562

Main Article Content

Arief Darmawan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap pengaruh pendekatan blended learning menggunakan portal rumah belajar dan kepercayaan diri siswa terhadap hasil belajar IPA Terpadu. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif komparatif dengan metode eksperimen. Kelompok ekperimen menggunakan pendekatan blended learning dengan portal rumah belajar sebagai sarana belajar online, sedangkan kelompok kontrol menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual. Analisa hasil penelitian menggunakan ANOVA dua jalur dilanjutkan dengan uji Tukey. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPA Terpadu kelompok siswa yang menggunakan pendekatan blended learning lebih tinggi daripada kelompok siswa yang menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual; (2) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran dan tingkat kepercayaan diri siswa terhadap hasil belajar IPA terpadu; (3) pendekatan blended learning memberikan hasil belajar IPA terpadu yang lebih tinggi bagi kelompok siswa yang memiliki kepercayaan diri tinggi; (4) pendekatan kontekstual memberikan hasil belajar IPA terpadu yang lebih tinggi bagi kelompok siswa yang memiliki kepercayaan diri rendah.This research aimed to reveal the effect of blended learning approach and student’s self-confidence on the learning outcomes of integrated science. It used quantitative-comparative approach with experimental method. The experimental group used blended learning approach by utilizing the educational portal (Rumah Belajar) as an online learning tool, while the control group used contextual learning approach. The result of the study was analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and followed by Tukey’s test. The results indicated: (1) learning outcomes of integrated science of the students group using blended learning approach was higher than the group using contextual learning approach; (2) there was an interaction effect of learning approach and students’ confidence level on the learning outcomes of integrated science; (3) blended learning approach brought higher learning outcomes of integrated science to the group of students with higher self-confidence; (4) contextual learning approach brought higher learning outcomes of integrated science to the group of students with lower self-confidence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Darmawan, A. (2019). PENGARUH PENDEKATAN BLENDED LEARNING MENGGUNAKAN PORTAL RUMAH BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA THE EFFECT OF BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH BY UTILIZING “RUMAH BELAJAR” PORTAL ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF INTEGRATED SCIENCE. Jurnal Teknodik, 17(3), 065–079. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.562
Issue
Jurnal Teknodik Vol,17 No. 3, September 2013
Section
Articles

Please download and complete the Form, Copyright Transfer, and Ethics Statement Form. The following is provided at the time of submitting the text (Upload Additional Files):

References

Allen, I. Elaine, Jeff Seamean, dan Richard Garrett. 2009. Blending in: The Extent and Promise of Blended

Education in the United States. Virginia: Nacol.

Chen, Clement C., dan Keith T. Jones. 2007. “Blended learning VS Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perseptions in an MBA Accounting Course.†The Journal of Educators Online,Volume 4, Number 1, January 2007.

Dabbagh, Nada., dan Brenda Bannan-Ritland. 2005.Online Learning: Concept, Strategies, and Application. New

Jersey: Pearson prentice Hall.

Dziuban, Charles D., Joel L. Hartman, dan Patsy D. Moskal. 2004. “Blended Learning.†EDUCAUSE, Vol. 2004, Issue 7.

Eduviews. 2009. Blended learning: Where Online and Face-to-Face Instruction Intersect for 21st Century Teaching

and Learning. Washington, DC: Blackboard Inc.

Fatimah, Enung. 2006. Psikologi Perkembangan (Perkembangan Peserta Didik). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Jihad, Asep dan Abdul Haris. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Johnson, Elaine B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning. California: Corwin Press Inc.

Keller, John M. 2010. Motivational Design For Learning and Performance:The ARCS Model Approach. Florida:

Springer.

Lynch, Richard dan Myron Dembo.2004. The Relationship between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended learning Context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Volume 5, Number 2, Agustus 2004.

Nugrasanti, Renni. 2006. Locus of Control dan Prokrastinasi Akademik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Provitae, Volume 2 No. 1, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta bekerjasama dengan Yayasan Obor Indonesia Mei 2006.

Nurhadi, Burhanuddin Yasin, dan Agus G.S. 2003. Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning/ CTL) dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Nurhayati, Ai Sri. 2010. Pedoman Pemanfaatan Rumah Belajar. Jakarta: Pustekkom.

Soekartawi. 2006. Blended e-Learning: Alternatif Model Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Indonesia.†Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2006 (SNATI 2006), 17 Juni 2006.

Staker, Heather., dan Michael B. Horn. Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. California: Innosightinstitute, 2012.

Ubaedy, AN. Berkarier di Era Global. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo, 2008.

Watson, John. Blending Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education. Virginia: Nacol, 2009.