PENGARUH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING BERDIFERENSIASI DENGAN AKTIVITAS INKUIRI GEOGRAFIS TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR SPASIAL SISWA
The Effect of Differentiated Project-based Learning with Geographic Inquiry Activities to Students’ Spatial Thinking Skill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.vi.1015Keywords:
Berpikir Spasial, Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi, Gaya Belajar, Geographic InquiryAbstract
Penelitan ini mengkaji aktivitas geographic inquiry pada project-based learning untuk meningkatkan berpikir spasial siswa. Diferensiasi yang dimasukkan sebagai variable moderator berupa gaya belajar. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 64 siswa SMK yang belajar pemetaan topografi pada Program Keahlian Geologi Pertambangan. Data yang didapat kemudian dianalisis menggunakan ANOVA dua jalur, dengan faktorial 2x3 melalui program SPSS 24. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) ada perbedaan signifikan antar model pembelajaran terhadap keterampilan berpikir spasial, dengan nilai sig 0,003; 2) ada perbedaan signifikan antar gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan berpikir spasial, dengan nilai sig 0,004; dan 3) ada interaksi signifikan antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan berpikir spasial, dengan nilai sig 0,000. Aktivitas geographical inquiry pada project-based learning paling sesuai digunakan pada siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetik.
This research examines geographic inquiry activities in project-based learning to improve students' spatial thinking skill. The differentiation included as a moderator variable is the students’ learning style. The subject of this research is 64 Students who learn topographic mapping in Geological Mining Vocational Program. The achieved data is analyzed by using two lines ANOVA with the 2x3 factorial through SPSS 24 program. The result shows that: 1) there is significant difference between the learning models to spatial thinking skill, with the sig value of 0.003; 2) there is significant difference between the learning styles to spatial thinking skill, with the sig value of 0.004; and 3) there is significant interaction between the learning model as well as learning style and spatial thinking skill, with sig value 0.000. Geographical inquiry activities in project-based learning is most suitable used by the students with kinesthetic learning style.
References
Bearman, N., Jones, N., André, I., Cachinho, H. A., & DeMers, M. (2016). The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729
Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. Corwin, A SAGE Publications Company.
Bertsch, A., Saeed, M. O., & Ondracek, J. (2015). An Investigation of Learning Style Theory and GPA at a U.S. University Who trusts social media? View project Waste Management View project. July. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281121947
Bilgin, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Ay, Y. (2015). The effects of project based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1015a
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2018). Reinventing Project-Based Learning: Your Field Guide to Real-World Projects in Digital Age. ISTE.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. In Educational Research Review. 26. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Fernandes, S. R. G. (2014). Preparing Graduates for Professional Practice: Findings from a Case Study of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.064
Ghazivakili, Z., Norouzi Nia, R., Panahi, F., Karimi, M., Gholsorkhi, H., & Ahmadi, Z. (2014). The role of critical thinking skills and learning styles of university students in their academic performance. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2(3), 95–102. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512928%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4235550
Heffron, S., & Downs, R. (2012). Geography for Life Second Edition. National Council for Geographic Education.
Huynh, N. T., Solem, M., & Bednarz, S. W. (2015). A Road Map for Learning Progressions Research in Geography. Journal of Geography, 114(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.935799
Indrawati, Samsul Bahri, Muh. Rusmayadi, Muh. Galang Isnawan, & Imam Pakhrurrozi. (2022). Pelaksanaan Asesmen Diagnostik: Tes Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VII di SMPN 4 Keruak. Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29303/rengganis.v2i1.156
Kerski, J. J., Demirci, A., & Milson, A. J. (2013). The Global Landscape of GIS in Secondary Education. Journal of Geography, 112(6), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2013.801506
Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking Through Project-Based Learning: Guiding Deeper Inquiry. Corwin, A SAGE Publications Company.
Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2019). On the possible interactions of varied EFL activities and learning styles with EFL students’ motivational changes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1420654
Kusairi, S. (2013). Analisis Asesmen Formatif Fisika Sma Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(3), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1106
Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2012). [1] J. Lee and R. Bednarz, “Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test,” J. Geog., no. April 2013, pp. 37–41, 2012.Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography, April 2013, 37–41. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221341.2011.583262
Markham. (2012). Project Based Learning Design and Coaching Guide: Expert Tools for Innovation and Inquiry for K-12 Educators. Buck Institute for Education.
Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing Relationships. American Educator, 26–32.
Oktavianto, D. A., Sumarmi, & Handoyo, B. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berbantuan Google Earth terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis the Effect of Project-Based Learning Assisted Google Earth to Spatial Thinking Skills. Jurnal Teknodik, 21(1), 1–15. https://jurnalteknodik.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jurnalteknodik/article/view/227
Phillips, J. D., Schwanghart, W., & Heckmann, T. (2015). Graph theory in the geosciences. Earth-Science Reviews, 143, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.02.002
Ridha, S., & Kamil, P. A. (2021). The Problems of Teaching Geospatial Technology in Developing Countries: Concepts, Curriculum, and Implementation in Indonesia. Journal of Geography, 120(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1872681
Riihimaki, C. A., & Viskupic, K. (2020). Motivators and inhibitors to change: Why and how geoscience faculty modify their course content and teaching methods. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1628590
Roberts, M. (2014). Powerful knowledge and geographical education. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.894481
Schlemper, M. B., Athreya, B., Czajkowski, K., Stewart, V. C., & Shetty, S. (2019). Teaching Spatial Thinking and Geospatial Technologies Through Citizen Mapping and Problem-Based Inquiry in Grades 7-12. Journal of Geography, 118(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1501083
Shin, E. E., Milson, A. J., & Smith, T. J. (2016). Future Teachers’ Spatial Thinking Skills and Attitudes. Journal of Geography, 115(4), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2015.1100654
Supriyadi, S., Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., Isnaeni, W., & Suraji, S. (2022). Penyusunan Instrumen Asesmen Diagnostik untuk Persiapan Kurikulum Merdeka. 2(1), 67–73.
Taylor, B. K. (2015). Content, process, and product: Modeling differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2015.988559
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please download and complete the Form, Copyright Transfer, and Ethics Statement Form. The following is provided at the time of submitting the text (Upload Additional Files):
